The “Media World After WikiLeaks and
News of the World” conference at UNESCO on 16 – 17 February explored how new
media institutions are responding to the deepening digital era.
Although there has not been a flood
of leaks since Wikileaks release of confidential diplomatic cables, newsrooms
are still facing increases in the velocity and volume of data, including a mass
of information sent in by the public. In recognising this, conference
speakers highlighted the need to maintain verification standards and continue
to carefully assess public interest when publishing sensitive information.
Participants also highlighted the
necessity to protect sources, including whistleblowers, and the dangers that
electronic communications could expose identities.
In the wake of the News of the World
scandal, self-regulation was scrutinized, with the point being made that
forthcoming decisions in the UK and South Africa could have substantial
influence in other areas. Participants stressed the benefits of journalistic
self-regulation, including in the online arena. It was argued that where there
was state intervention, it should be by judicial, rather than executive, means.
The conference heard that although
the internet is still less restricted than traditional media around the world,
governments in 40 countries now have restricting measures in place – up from
two countries in 2002. Speakers stressed that restrictions which targeted
online child pornography or legitimate national security should not be used as
excuses for wider censorship, and needed to operate within international
standards for freedom of expression.
Delegates further emphasised that
the news media should increasingly take note of changes in legal regimes around
the world, as well as the actions of “intermediary” bodies like search engines,
web-site hosts and online social networks.
There was strong acknowledgement of
a complementary relationship between citizen contributors and professional
journalists as something that could strengthen press freedom and improve the
quality of journalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment